You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identifying Potential Habitat for the Endangered Aleutian Shield Fern Using Topographical Characteristics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3996/032012-jfwm-023 |
| Authors |
Adam Duarte, Daniel M. Wolcott, T. Edwin Chow, Mark A. Ricca |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 30% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 20% |
| Researcher | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 60% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2017.
All research outputs
#6,598,118
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management
#41
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,969
of 285,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them