You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sample design effects in landscape genetics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-012-0415-1 |
| Authors |
Sara J. Oyler-McCance, Bradley C. Fedy, Erin L. Landguth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Guatemala | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 276 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 85 | 29% |
| Researcher | 70 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 191 | 65% |
| Environmental Science | 40 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 31 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2017.
All research outputs
#15,395,259
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#849
of 1,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,453
of 172,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.