↓ Skip to main content

Effects of a non-native biocontrol weevil, Larinus planus, and other emerging threats on populations of the federally threatened Pitcher’s thistle, Cirsium pitcheri

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of a non-native biocontrol weevil, Larinus planus, and other emerging threats on populations of the federally threatened Pitcher’s thistle, Cirsium pitcheri
Published in
Biological Conservation, October 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.010
Authors

Kayri Havens, Claudia L. Jolls, Julie E. Marik, Pati Vitt, A. Kathryn McEachern, Darcy Kind

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 86 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 26 29%
Student > Master 13 14%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 63%
Environmental Science 15 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Unspecified 1 1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 11 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#4,132
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,217
of 190,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#34
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.