↓ Skip to main content

Upregulation of emotion areas through neurofeedback with a focus on positive mood

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Upregulation of emotion areas through neurofeedback with a focus on positive mood
Published in
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, November 2010
DOI 10.3758/s13415-010-0010-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen Johnston, D. E. J. Linden, D. Healy, R. Goebel, I. Habes, S. G. Boehm

Abstract

Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging can be used to feed back signal changes from the brain to participants such that they can train to modulate activation levels in specific brain areas. Here we present the first study combining up-regulation of brain areas for positive emotions with psychometric measures to assess the effect of successful self-regulation on subsequent mood. We localized brain areas associated with positive emotions through presentation of standardized pictures with positive valence. Participants up-regulated activation levels in their target area during specific periods, alternating with rest. Participants attained reliable self-control of the target area by the last of three seven-minute runs. This training effect was supported by an extensive network outside the targeted brain region, including higher sensory areas, paralimbic and orbitofrontal cortex. Self-control of emotion areas was not accompanied by clear changes in self-reported emotions; trend-level improvements on depression scores were counteracted by increases on measures of fatigue, resulting in no overall mood improvement. It is possible that benefits of self-control of emotion networks may only appear in people who display abnormal emotional homeostasis. The use of only a single, short, training session, overlap between positive and negative emotion networks and aversive reactions to the scanning environment may have prevented the detection of subtle changes in mood.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 5 2%
Japan 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 236 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 47 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 17%
Student > Master 38 15%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 50 19%
Unknown 32 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 106 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 9%
Neuroscience 22 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 8%
Engineering 14 5%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 43 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2016.
All research outputs
#14,281,005
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#471
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,974
of 186,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.