↓ Skip to main content

Intake of whole grains from different cereal and food sources and incidence of colorectal cancer in the Scandinavian HELGA cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes & Control, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
6 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Intake of whole grains from different cereal and food sources and incidence of colorectal cancer in the Scandinavian HELGA cohort
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10552-013-0215-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cecilie Kyrø, Guri Skeie, Steffen Loft, Rikard Landberg, Jane Christensen, Eiliv Lund, Lena M. Nilsson, Richard Palmqvist, Anne Tjønneland, Anja Olsen

Abstract

A high intake of whole grains has been associated with a lower incidence of colorectal cancer, but few studies are available on the association with whole grains from different cereals, for example, wheat, rye and oats, and none has addressed these separately. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between whole-grain intake and colorectal cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 75 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 7 9%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 20 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,134,678
of 24,220,739 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#354
of 2,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,029
of 195,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#11
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,220,739 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.