You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Which uncertainty? Using expert elicitation and expected value of information to design an adaptive program
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.020 |
| Authors |
Michael C. Runge, Sarah J. Converse, James E. Lyons |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 38% |
| Sweden | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 5 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 477 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 3% |
| Australia | 8 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Mozambique | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Botswana | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 438 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 123 | 26% |
| Researcher | 117 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 62 | 13% |
| Other | 25 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 56 | 12% |
| Unknown | 70 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 165 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 132 | 28% |
| Engineering | 17 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 46 | 10% |
| Unknown | 89 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,901,619
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,585
of 6,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,860
of 125,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#10
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.