You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Developing Empirical Collapse Fragility Functions for Global Building Types
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Earthquake Spectra, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1193/1.3606398 |
| Authors |
Kishor Jaiswal, David Wald, Dina D'Ayala |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 33% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 73 | 59% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Earthquake Spectra
#121
of 367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,236
of 119,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earthquake Spectra
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.