↓ Skip to main content

A Computer Program for Flow‐Log Analysis of Single Holes (FLASH)

Overview of attention for article published in Ground Water, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Computer Program for Flow‐Log Analysis of Single Holes (FLASH)
Published in
Ground Water, February 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2011.00798.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frederick D. Day‐Lewis, Carole D. Johnson, Frederick L. Paillet, Keith J. Halford

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Czechia 1 3%
France 1 3%
Unknown 28 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 38%
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 50%
Environmental Science 5 16%
Engineering 4 13%
Computer Science 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ground Water
#251
of 893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,220
of 194,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ground Water
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.