You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Investigating the spatial distribution of water levels in the Mackenzie Delta using airborne LiDAR
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Hydrological Processes, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/hyp.8167 |
| Authors |
C. Hopkinson, N. Crasto, P. Marsh, D. Forbes, L. Lesack |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 7% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 15 | 33% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 30% |
| Engineering | 6 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,142,437
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Hydrological Processes
#737
of 2,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,714
of 114,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrological Processes
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.