You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementing telemetry on new species in remote areas: recommendations from a large-scale satellite tracking study of African waterfowl
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ostrich, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2989/00306525.2011.556786 |
| Authors |
Julien Cappelle, Samuel A Iverson, John Y Takekawa, Scott H Newman, Tim Dodman, Nicolas Gaidet |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 26% |
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Ostrich
#218
of 619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,222
of 108,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ostrich
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.