↓ Skip to main content

Crohn’s Disease: an Immune Deficiency State

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 690)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
patent
15 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
Crohn’s Disease: an Immune Deficiency State
Published in
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12016-009-8133-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel J. B. Marks, Farooq Z. Rahman, Gavin W. Sewell, Anthony W. Segal

Abstract

Crohn's disease is a chronic inflammatory disorder primarily affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Its clinical manifestations arise from a substantial infiltration of the intestinal mucosa by activated leukocytes and the downstream consequences of chronic inflammation. The underlying cause driving this immunological reaction remains poorly understood. A number of hypotheses have been proposed, most of which postulate a primary over-activation of the immune response, based on the pathological appearances of active Crohn's lesions. Interestingly, none of these theories have been mechanistically proven. It is possible that the immunological events responsible for disease initiation are quite different from those contributing to its persistence and propagation. A substantial body of data has emerged in recent years to suggest that the primary defect in Crohn's disease is actually one of relative immunodeficiency. This review considers the evidence for such a phenomenon in contrast to alternative prevailing hypotheses and attempts to address some of the potential paradoxes that it generates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 4%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 138 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 17%
Researcher 24 17%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 22 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 24 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#663,157
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#15
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,459
of 95,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them