You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reptile and Amphibian Responses to Large-Scale Wildfires in Southern California
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Herpetology, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1670/08-143.1 |
| Authors |
Carlton J. Rochester, Cheryl S. Brehme, Denise R. Clark, Drew C. Stokes, Stacie A. Hathaway, Robert N. Fisher |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 51% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2020.
All research outputs
#969,596
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Herpetology
#18
of 1,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,743
of 103,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Herpetology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them