You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Community variations in social vulnerability to Cascadia-related tsunamis in the U.S. Pacific Northwest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-009-9376-1 |
| Authors |
Nathan J. Wood, Christopher G. Burton, Susan L. Cutter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 257 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 65 | 25% |
| Researcher | 43 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 17% |
| Unknown | 41 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 60 | 23% |
| Environmental Science | 55 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 42 | 16% |
| Engineering | 20 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 9% |
| Unknown | 60 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,294,263
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#194
of 1,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,279
of 93,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.