You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A historical perspective on the “fish tumors or other deformities” beneficial use impairment at Great Lakes Areas of Concern
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Great Lakes Research, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jglr.2009.07.005 |
| Authors |
Sean D. Rafferty, Vicki S. Blazer, Alfred E. Pinkney, James L. Grazio, Eric C. Obert, Lori Boughton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 75% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 35 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 32% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 22% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2018.
All research outputs
#13,488,874
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#932
of 1,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,306
of 165,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.