↓ Skip to main content

Retention of Riverine Sediment and Nutrient Loads by Coastal Plain Floodplains

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retention of Riverine Sediment and Nutrient Loads by Coastal Plain Floodplains
Published in
Ecosystems, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10021-009-9253-5
Authors

Gregory B. Noe, Cliff R. Hupp

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 5%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Unknown 145 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 23%
Student > Master 16 10%
Professor 8 5%
Other 7 4%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 29 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 50 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 27 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 17%
Engineering 4 3%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 40 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#636
of 1,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,984
of 97,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them