You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Spatial and temporal patterns of chronic wasting disease: fine‐scale mapping of a wildlife epidemic in Wisconsin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Applications, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1890/08-0578.1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erik E. Osnas, Dennis M. Heisey, Robert E. Rolley, Michael D. Samuel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#1,854
of 3,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,074
of 122,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.