You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implications of estimated magmatic additions and recycling losses at the subduction zones of accretionary (non-collisional) and collisional (suturing) orogens
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1144/sp318.4 |
| Authors |
David W. Scholl, Roland von Huene |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 25% |
| Researcher | 16 | 17% |
| Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 11 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 66 | 71% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 23 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Geological Society, London, Special Publications
#629
of 1,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,775
of 448,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geological Society, London, Special Publications
#214
of 1,026 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,026 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.