You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An experimental study of hydromagmatic fragmentation through energetic, non-explosive magma–water mixing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.09.012 |
| Authors |
L.G. Mastin, O. Spieler, W.S. Downey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 30% |
| Researcher | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 34 | 63% |
| Engineering | 5 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,689,826
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research
#761
of 2,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,051
of 109,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.