↓ Skip to main content

International importance of the eastern Chukchi Sea as a staging area for migrating king eiders

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
International importance of the eastern Chukchi Sea as a staging area for migrating king eiders
Published in
Polar Biology, February 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00300-008-0580-3
Authors

Steffen Oppel, D. Lynne Dickson, Abby N. Powell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 44 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 30%
Other 9 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 57%
Environmental Science 8 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#600
of 1,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,699
of 170,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.