↓ Skip to main content

Significance of model credibility in estimating climate projection distributions for regional hydroclimatological risk assessments

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Significance of model credibility in estimating climate projection distributions for regional hydroclimatological risk assessments
Published in
Climatic Change, February 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10584-007-9388-3
Authors

Levi D. Brekke, Michael D. Dettinger, Edwin P. Maurer, Michael Anderson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 6%
Canada 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 102 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 29%
Researcher 27 24%
Student > Master 8 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 5%
Professor 4 4%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 29 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 25 22%
Engineering 19 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 19 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#2,146,406
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#1,500
of 5,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,788
of 79,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.