↓ Skip to main content

Evidence of Infection by H5N2 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Viruses in Healthy Wild Waterfowl

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Pathogens, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence of Infection by H5N2 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Viruses in Healthy Wild Waterfowl
Published in
PLoS Pathogens, August 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000127
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Gaidet, Giovanni Cattoli, Saliha Hammoumi, Scott H. Newman, Ward Hagemeijer, John Y. Takekawa, Julien Cappelle, Tim Dodman, Tony Joannis, Patricia Gil, Isabella Monne, Alice Fusaro, Ilaria Capua, Shiiwuua Manu, Pierfrancesco Micheloni, Ulf Ottosson, John H. Mshelbwala, Juan Lubroth, Joseph Domenech, François Monicat

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Italy 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Réunion 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
French Polynesia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 122 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 17%
Other 13 10%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 10 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 48%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 15 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 9%
Environmental Science 7 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 17 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2019.
All research outputs
#5,452,627
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Pathogens
#4,479
of 9,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,897
of 92,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Pathogens
#22
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.