You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multiscale Habitat Use and Selection in Cooperatively Breeding Micronesian Kingfishers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Management, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.2193/2006-011 |
| Authors |
DYLAN C. KESLER, SUSAN M. HAIG |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 63 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 57% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,178,221
of 24,514,423 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#927
of 2,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,209
of 189,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#12
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,514,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.