You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Growth rate differences between resident native brook trout and non‐native brown trout
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Fish Biology, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01615.x |
| Authors |
S. M. Carlson, A. P. Hendry, B. H. Letcher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Canada | 2 | 33% |
| France | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 6% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 52% |
| Environmental Science | 26 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2020.
All research outputs
#8,274,547
of 25,603,577 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Fish Biology
#1,611
of 5,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,135
of 89,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Fish Biology
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,603,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.