↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes from full‐dilatation cesarean deliveries using the Fetal Pillow or hand‐push method

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes from full‐dilatation cesarean deliveries using the Fetal Pillow or hand‐push method
Published in
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, August 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.06.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huda Safa, Michael Beckmann

Abstract

To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes of full-dilatation cesarean deliveries using the Fetal Pillow or hand- push method. A retrospective cohort study included data from all women who underwent full-dilatation cesarean deliveries at term that involved the use of the Fetal Pillow or the hand-push method at Mater Mothers' Hospital, Brisbane, Australia between May 1, 2013 and March 31, 2015. Maternal (estimated blood loss, need for blood transfusion, uterine angle extension, and duration of stay in hospital following delivery) and neonatal outcomes (5-minute Apgar score below 7, cord arterial pH, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, and need for endotracheal intubation) were compared between the two treatment methods. Of 361 cesarean deliveries performed at full dilation during the study period, clinicians documented the use of a Fetal Pillow in 91 deliveries and use of the hand-push method in 69. Lower mean intra-operative blood loss (P=0.026), a shorter duration of postpartum hospital admission (P=0.002), and higher mean cord arterial pH (P=0.003) were observed in the Fetal Pillow group. The Fetal Pillow appears to be a safe and effective aid for the delivery of the fetal head during cesarean deliveries at full dilatation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 19 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 24 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,074,287
of 24,561,012 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
#1,014
of 4,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,770
of 348,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,561,012 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.