You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multiple‐species analysis of point count data: a more parsimonious modelling framework
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01271.x |
| Authors |
MATHEW W. ALLDREDGE, KENNETH H. POLLOCK, THEODORE R. SIMONS, SUSAN A. SHRINER |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 4% |
| Italy | 3 | 1% |
| Portugal | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 239 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 86 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 13% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 18% |
| Unknown | 29 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 168 | 62% |
| Environmental Science | 64 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Mathematics | 1 | <1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 34 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2019.
All research outputs
#16,732,953
of 24,609,626 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#3,668
of 3,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,264
of 81,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#20
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,609,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.