↓ Skip to main content

REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES OF NORTHERN GEESE: WHY WAIT?

Overview of attention for article published in Ornithology, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES OF NORTHERN GEESE: WHY WAIT?
Published in
Ornithology, January 2007
DOI 10.1642/0004-8038(2007)124[594:rsongw]2.0.co;2
Authors

Craig R. Ely, Karen S. Bollinger, Roseann V. Densmore, Thomas C. Rothe, Michael J. Petrula, John Y. Takekawa, Dennis L. Orthmeyer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 6%
United States 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 32 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Other 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 58%
Environmental Science 5 14%
Computer Science 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Ornithology
#811
of 2,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,195
of 168,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ornithology
#10
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.