You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identifying Suitable Sites for Florida Panther Reintroduction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Management, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[752:issffp]2.0.co;2 |
| Authors |
CINDY A. THATCHER, FRANK T. VAN MANEN, JOSEPH D. CLARK |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Papua New Guinea | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 6 | 3% |
| India | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Belize | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 207 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 56 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 45 | 19% |
| Unknown | 18 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 132 | 57% |
| Environmental Science | 60 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2017.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#2,288
of 2,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,560
of 191,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#318
of 352 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,658 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 352 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.