↓ Skip to main content

Bias and uncertainty in regression-calibrated models of groundwater flow in heterogeneous media

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Water Resources, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bias and uncertainty in regression-calibrated models of groundwater flow in heterogeneous media
Published in
Advances in Water Resources, May 2006
DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.07.012
Authors

Richard L. Cooley, Steen Christensen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 35%
Researcher 9 29%
Other 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Student > Master 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 35%
Environmental Science 7 23%
Engineering 5 16%
Computer Science 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Water Resources
#258
of 876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,843
of 83,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Water Resources
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 876 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them