↓ Skip to main content

Radiative transfer modeling of dust‐coated Pancam calibration target materials: Laboratory visible/near‐infrared spectrogoniometry

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geophysical Research, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Radiative transfer modeling of dust‐coated Pancam calibration target materials: Laboratory visible/near‐infrared spectrogoniometry
Published in
Journal of Geophysical Research, October 2006
DOI 10.1029/2005je002658
Authors

Jeffrey R. Johnson, Jascha Sohl‐Dickstein, William M. Grundy, Raymond E. Arvidson, James Bell, Phil Christensen, Trevor Graff, Edward A. Guinness, Kjartan Kinch, Richard Morris, Michael K. Shepard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 7%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 37%
Physics and Astronomy 8 27%
Engineering 3 10%
Chemistry 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#3,601
of 12,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,490
of 84,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#43
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.