↓ Skip to main content

Rupture models for the A.D. 900–930 Seattle fault earthquake from uplifted shorelines

Overview of attention for article published in Geology, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rupture models for the A.D. 900–930 Seattle fault earthquake from uplifted shorelines
Published in
Geology, January 2006
DOI 10.1130/g22173.1
Authors

Uri S. ten Brink, Jianli Song, Robert C. Bucknam

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Master 6 16%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Other 4 11%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 31 82%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Geology
#3,012
of 4,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,331
of 174,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geology
#44
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.