You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modeling regional initiation of rainfall-induced shallow landslides in the eastern Umbria Region of central Italy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Landslides, May 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10346-006-0037-0 |
| Authors |
Diana Salciarini, Jonathan W. Godt, William Z. Savage, Pietro Conversini, Rex L. Baum, John A. Michael |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 145 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 24% |
| Researcher | 27 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 50 | 34% |
| Engineering | 41 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 31 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Landslides
#214
of 522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,609
of 64,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landslides
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them