↓ Skip to main content

Upper Neogene stratigraphy and tectonics of Death Valley — a review

Overview of attention for article published in Earth-Science Reviews, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Upper Neogene stratigraphy and tectonics of Death Valley — a review
Published in
Earth-Science Reviews, December 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2005.07.004
Authors

J.R. Knott, A.M. Sarna-Wojcicki, M.N. Machette, R.E. Klinger

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 75 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Master 10 13%
Professor 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 59 75%
Engineering 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 10 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Earth-Science Reviews
#1,005
of 1,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,771
of 160,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth-Science Reviews
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them