You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of Urbanization on the Distribution and Abundance of Amphibians and Invasive Species in Southern California Streams
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, October 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00295.x |
| Authors |
SETH P. D. RILEY, GARY T. BUSTEED, LEE B. KATS, THOMAS L. VANDERGON, LENA F. S. LEE, ROSI G. DAGIT, JACOB L. KERBY, ROBERT N. FISHER, RAYMOND M. SAUVAJOT |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 424 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 2% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 397 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 83 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 72 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 69 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 4% |
| Other | 75 | 18% |
| Unknown | 60 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 223 | 53% |
| Environmental Science | 102 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 2% |
| Engineering | 6 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 3% |
| Unknown | 68 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2009.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#2,763
of 4,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,180
of 76,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#9
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.