↓ Skip to main content

Evolutionary stability of mutualism: interspecific population regulation as an evolutionarily stable strategy

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolutionary stability of mutualism: interspecific population regulation as an evolutionarily stable strategy
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, September 2004
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2004.2789
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Nathaniel Holland, Donald L. DeAngelis, Stewart T. Schultz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Guadeloupe 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 157 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 25%
Researcher 34 19%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 6%
Other 36 20%
Unknown 16 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 110 62%
Environmental Science 21 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 26 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#8,147
of 11,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,017
of 70,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#33
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.