↓ Skip to main content

Functional implications of splicing polymorphisms in the human genome

Overview of attention for article published in Human Molecular Genetics, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional implications of splicing polymorphisms in the human genome
Published in
Human Molecular Genetics, May 2013
DOI 10.1093/hmg/ddt200
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yerbol Z. Kurmangaliyev, Roman A. Sutormin, Sergey A. Naumenko, Georgii A. Bazykin, Mikhail S. Gelfand

Abstract

Proper splicing is often crucial for gene functioning and its disruption may be strongly deleterious. Nevertheless, even the essential for splicing canonical dinucleotides of the splice sites are often polymorphic. Here, we use data from The 1000 Genomes Project to study single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the canonical dinucleotides. Splice sites carrying SNPs are enriched in weakly expressed genes and in rarely used alternative splice sites. Genes with disrupted splice sites tend to have low selective constraint, and the splice sites disrupted by SNPs are less likely to be conserved in mouse. Furthermore, SNPs are enriched in splice sites whose effects on gene function are minor: splice sites located outside of protein-coding regions, in shorter exons, closer to the 3'-ends of proteins, and outside of functional protein domains. Most of these effects are more pronounced for high-frequency SNPs. Despite these trends, many of the polymorphic sites may still substantially affect the function of the corresponding genes. A number of the observed splice site-disrupting SNPs, including several high-frequency ones, were found among mutations described in OMIM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Ukraine 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 50 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 30%
Researcher 14 26%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 4 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2013.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Human Molecular Genetics
#6,632
of 8,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,747
of 204,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Molecular Genetics
#64
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.