↓ Skip to main content

Effect of different sampling schemes on the spatial placement of conservation reserves in Utah, USA

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, September 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of different sampling schemes on the spatial placement of conservation reserves in Utah, USA
Published in
Biological Conservation, September 2003
DOI 10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00358-0
Authors

Scott D. Bassett, Thomas C. Edwards

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 6%
Brazil 4 4%
South Africa 3 3%
Switzerland 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 81 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 29%
Student > Master 12 12%
Other 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Other 28 27%
Unknown 3 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 49%
Environmental Science 39 38%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 4%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 4 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#4,133
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,837
of 53,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.