↓ Skip to main content

Ubiquity and Persistence of Escherichia coli in a Midwestern Coastal Stream†

Overview of attention for article published in Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ubiquity and Persistence of Escherichia coli in a Midwestern Coastal Stream†
Published in
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2003
DOI 10.1128/aem.69.8.4549-4555.2003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muruleedhara Byappanahalli, Melanie Fowler, Dawn Shively, Richard Whitman

Abstract

Dunes Creek, a small Lake Michigan coastal stream that drains sandy aquifers and wetlands of Indiana Dunes, has chronically elevated Escherichia coli levels along the bathing beach near its outfall. This study sought to understand the sources of E. coli in Dunes Creek's central branch. A systematic survey of random and fixed sampling points of water and sediment was conducted over 3 years. E. coli concentrations in Dunes Creek and beach water were significantly correlated. Weekly monitoring at 14 stations during 1999 and 2000 indicated chronic loading of E. coli throughout the stream. Significant correlations between E. coli numbers in stream water and stream sediment, submerged sediment and margin, and margin and 1 m from shore were found. Median E. coli counts were highest in stream sediments, followed by bank sediments, sediments along spring margins, stream water, and isolated pools; in forest soils, E. coli counts were more variable and relatively lower. Sediment moisture was significantly correlated with E. coli counts. Direct fecal input inadequately explains the widespread and consistent occurrence of E. coli in the Dunes Creek watershed; long-term survival or multiplication or both seem likely. The authors conclude that (i) E. coli is ubiquitous and persistent throughout the Dunes Creek basin, (ii) E. coli occurrence and distribution in riparian sediments help account for the continuous loading of the bacteria in Dunes Creek, and (iii) ditching of the stream, increased drainage, and subsequent loss of wetlands may account for the chronically high E. coli levels observed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 107 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 19%
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 36 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 30%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Engineering 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 21 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
#8,288
of 19,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,649
of 53,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
#72
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.