You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
CLAM DENSITY AND SCAUP FEEDING BEHAVIOR IN SAN PABLO BAY, CALIFORNIA
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ornithological Applications, January 2002
|
DOI | 10.1650/0010-5422(2002)104[0518:cdasfb]2.0.co;2 |
Authors |
Victoria K. Poulton, James R. Lovvorn, John Y. Takekawa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 31 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 35% |
Environmental Science | 10 | 29% |
Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2010.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ornithological Applications
#693
of 2,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,444
of 130,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ornithological Applications
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.