↓ Skip to main content

The significance of pockmarks to understanding fluid flow processes and geohazards

Overview of attention for article published in Geofluids, May 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 182)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
290 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The significance of pockmarks to understanding fluid flow processes and geohazards
Published in
Geofluids, May 2002
DOI 10.1046/j.1468-8123.2002.00028.x
Authors

M. Hovland, J. V. Gardner, A. G. Judd

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Israel 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 238 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 24%
Researcher 55 22%
Student > Master 40 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Other 10 4%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 36 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 143 58%
Environmental Science 17 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Engineering 5 2%
Energy 4 2%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 52 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,643,111
of 24,633,436 outputs
Outputs from Geofluids
#15
of 182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,151
of 125,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geofluids
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,633,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 182 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.