You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An evaluation of long-term preservation methods for brown bear (Ursus arctos) faecal DNA samples
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, December 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1020503330767 |
| Authors |
Melanie A. Murphy, Lisette P. Waits, Katherine C. Kendall, Samuel K. Wasser, Jerry A. Higbee, Robert Bogden |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 339 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | 1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Czechia | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 4% |
| Unknown | 307 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 85 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 78 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 210 | 62% |
| Environmental Science | 51 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 4% |
| Unknown | 35 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,436,707
of 25,494,370 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#190
of 1,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,264
of 136,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,494,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them