You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
National-Scale, Field-Based Evaluation of the Biota−Sediment Accumulation Factor Model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science & Technology, March 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1021/es0016452 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles S. Wong, Paul D. Capel, Lisa H. Nowell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 31% |
| Researcher | 7 | 20% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 13 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,799,086
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#4,333
of 20,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,003
of 43,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#5
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.