You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Imaging the Seattle Fault Zone with high‐resolution seismic tomography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geophysical Research Letters, June 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1029/2000gl012778 |
| Authors |
Andrew J. Calvert, Michael A. Fisher |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 50% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 75% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 13% |
| Engineering | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,308,887
of 24,858,211 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#10,074
of 20,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,753
of 40,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#26
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,858,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.