↓ Skip to main content

The management of dyspnea in cancer patients: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
The management of dyspnea in cancer patients: a systematic review
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, January 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00520-007-0389-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raymond Viola, Cathy Kiteley, Nancy S. Lloyd, Jean A. Mackay, Julie Wilson, Rebecca K. S. Wong, Supportive Care Guidelines Group of the Cancer Care Ontario Program in Evidence-Based Care

Abstract

The goal of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of four drug classes (opioids, phenothiazines, benzodiazepines, and systemic corticosteroids) for relieving dyspnea experienced by advanced cancer patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 89 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 14%
Student > Postgraduate 13 14%
Student > Master 11 12%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 24 26%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 18 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2016.
All research outputs
#2,590,118
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#478
of 4,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,200
of 155,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.