↓ Skip to main content

Pesticides in the atmosphere of the Mississippi River Valley, part I — rain

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, April 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pesticides in the atmosphere of the Mississippi River Valley, part I — rain
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, April 2000
DOI 10.1016/s0048-9697(99)00543-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael S Majewski, William T Foreman, Donald A Goolsby

Abstract

Weekly composite rainfall samples were collected in three paired urban and agricultural regions of the Midwestern United States and along the Mississippi River during April-September 1995. The paired sampling sites were located in Mississippi, Iowa, and Minnesota. A background site, removed from dense urban and agriculture areas, was located near Lake Superior in Michigan. Herbicides were the predominant type of pesticide detected at every site. Each sample was analyzed for 47 compounds and 23 of 26 herbicides, 13 of 18 insecticides, and three of three related transformation products were detected in one or more sample from each paired site. The detection frequency of herbicides and insecticides were nearly equivalent at the paired Iowa and Minnesota sites. In Mississippi, herbicides were detected more frequently at the agricultural site and insecticides were detected more frequently at the urban site. The highest total wet depositional amounts (microg pesticide/m2 per season) occurred at the agricultural sites in Mississippi (1980 microg/m2) and Iowa (490 microg/m2) and at the urban site in Iowa (696 microg/m2). Herbicides accounted for the majority of the wet depositional loading at the Iowa and Minnesota sites, but methyl parathion (1740 microg/m2) was the dominant compound contributing to the total loading at the agricultural site in Mississippi. Atrazine, CIAT (a transformation product of atrazine and propazine) and dacthal were detected most frequently (76, 53, and 53%, respectively) at the background site indicating their propensity for long-range atmospheric transport.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 16 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 14%
Engineering 5 12%
Chemistry 2 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2008.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#11,317
of 29,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,852
of 40,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#20
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.