| Title |
Intestinal microflora in the deep-sea isopodBathynomus giganteus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Microbiology, September 1982
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01566869 |
| Authors |
Paul J. Boyle, Ralph Mitchell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 60% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 60% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 20% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2010.
All research outputs
#5,562,465
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Current Microbiology
#360
of 2,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,758
of 7,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Microbiology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,398 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.