↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the use of “goodness‐of‐fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation

Overview of attention for article published in Water Resources Research, January 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3331 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1916 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating the use of “goodness‐of‐fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation
Published in
Water Resources Research, January 1999
DOI 10.1029/1998wr900018
Authors

David R. Legates, Gregory J. McCabe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,916 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 22 1%
Germany 7 <1%
Brazil 7 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
France 4 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Other 19 <1%
Unknown 1840 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 431 22%
Student > Master 322 17%
Researcher 292 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 116 6%
Student > Bachelor 85 4%
Other 285 15%
Unknown 385 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 484 25%
Environmental Science 360 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 286 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 148 8%
Computer Science 32 2%
Other 116 6%
Unknown 490 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,941,388
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Water Resources Research
#577
of 5,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,946
of 112,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Resources Research
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.