↓ Skip to main content

An adaptive annotation approach for biomedical entity and relation recognition

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Informatics, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 106)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
An adaptive annotation approach for biomedical entity and relation recognition
Published in
Brain Informatics, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40708-016-0036-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seid Muhie Yimam, Chris Biemann, Ljiljana Majnaric, Šefket Šabanović, Andreas Holzinger

Abstract

In this article, we demonstrate the impact of interactive machine learning: we develop biomedical entity recognition dataset using a human-into-the-loop approach. In contrary to classical machine learning, human-in-the-loop approaches do not operate on predefined training or test sets, but assume that human input regarding system improvement is supplied iteratively. Here, during annotation, a machine learning model is built on previous annotations and used to propose labels for subsequent annotation. To demonstrate that such interactive and iterative annotation speeds up the development of quality dataset annotation, we conduct three experiments. In the first experiment, we carry out an iterative annotation experimental simulation and show that only a handful of medical abstracts need to be annotated to produce suggestions that increase annotation speed. In the second experiment, clinical doctors have conducted a case study in annotating medical terms documents relevant for their research. The third experiment explores the annotation of semantic relations with relation instance learning across documents. The experiments validate our method qualitatively and quantitatively, and give rise to a more personalized, responsive information extraction technology.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 22%
Student > Master 13 22%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 29 49%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Linguistics 2 3%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,317,780
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Brain Informatics
#14
of 106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,588
of 298,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Informatics
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 106 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.