You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Models of Metal Binding Structures in Fulvic Acid from the Suwannee River, Georgia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Science & Technology, July 1998
|
DOI | 10.1021/es9708979 |
Authors |
J. A. Leenheer, G. K. Brown, P. MacCarthy, S. E. Cabaniss |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 93 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 25% |
Researcher | 20 | 20% |
Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
Other | 20 | 20% |
Unknown | 15 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 25 | 25% |
Chemistry | 20 | 20% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 8% |
Engineering | 6 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Unknown | 20 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#10,064
of 21,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,577
of 33,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#11
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.