↓ Skip to main content

Costs of twins in free-ranging white-bellied spider monkeys (Ateles belzebuth belzebuth) at Tinigua National Park, Colombia

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, November 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Costs of twins in free-ranging white-bellied spider monkeys (Ateles belzebuth belzebuth) at Tinigua National Park, Colombia
Published in
Primates, November 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10329-005-0163-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andres Link, Ana Cristina Palma, Adriana Velez, Ana Gabriela de Luna

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Slovenia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 79 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 60%
Environmental Science 8 9%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Psychology 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 10 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#471
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,892
of 146,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them