You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Field study and simulation of diurnal temperature effects on infiltration and variably saturated flow beneath an ephemeral stream
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Water Resources Research, September 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1029/98wr01572 |
| Authors |
Anne Dudek Ronan, David E. Prudic, Carl E. Thodal, Jim Constantz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 29% |
| Researcher | 20 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 36 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 24% |
| Engineering | 8 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,110,181
of 24,471,305 outputs
Outputs from Water Resources Research
#863
of 5,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,085
of 33,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Resources Research
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,471,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.